Skip to content

An Overstuffed Narrative: Seven Surrenders by Ada Palmer

13
Share

An Overstuffed Narrative: Seven Surrenders by Ada Palmer

Home / An Overstuffed Narrative: Seven Surrenders by Ada Palmer
Books book reviews

An Overstuffed Narrative: Seven Surrenders by Ada Palmer

By

Published on March 10, 2017

13
Share

I called Ada Palmer’s debut Too Like The Lightning “devastatingly accomplished… an arch and playful narrative,” when I reviewed it last summer. Too Like The Lightning was one part of a whole, the first half of a narrative that I expected Seven Surrenders would complete—and back then I said I couldn’t imagine that Palmer would “fail to stick the dismount.”

I may have been a trifle optimistic, for while Too Like The Lightning is a glittering baroque entry into the ranks of science fiction’s political thrillers, it saves its debut-novel flaws for the second part of the narrative. Seven Surrenders isn’t a poor continuation (or a conclusion: I’m given to understand that the Terra Ignota books will be four in number, with each two forming separate arcs) by any stretch of the imagination. But the span of months that separates the two volumes left me quite a lot of time to reflect on Too Like The Lightning. Time to lose the initial white heat of intoxication at Too Like The Lightning’s self-consciously archaising tone, its arch wryness, its playful blasphemy and neo-Enlightenment concerns. Too Like The Lightning dazzled with possibility: now Seven Surrenders has to turn all that shine into substance, and that?

That’s a tall order.

With Mycroft Canner’s Enlightenment-esque voice and their happily changeable approach to gendered pronouns no longer possessed of enchanting novelty, Seven Surrenders faces the challenge of turning the political and personal intrigues of Too Like The Lightning, its theologies and miracles and thematic concern with conflict in the post-scarcity age, into a coherent whole. But it turns out that it’s quite difficult to forge a climax and conclusion that satisfies the appetite when my expectations were raised pretty high: Seven Surrenders’ major problem is that there’s just too much going on across these two books for it to wrap up enough strands with enough attention paid to each that the reader feels that they’ve paid off.

It becomes clear in Seven Surrenders that Palmer’s series is building towards war, a war that further books may, perhaps, deal with—or whose consequences they may deal with—in more detail. (Some of the statements Palmer’s characters make about war strike me as factually dubious—for example, claiming an absence of major non-colonial wars for a generation before the start of WWI ignores the Ottoman-Russian, Greco-Turkish, and Balkan conflicts between 1877 and 1914, which developed, if the major powers were looking, new tactics for warfare with modern weapons; while asserting technological change and lack of knowledgeable veterans as the primary causes of the high casualty rate of the Great War is definitely arguable.) But the clever card-pyramid of intrigue and secrets and betrayals and lies and plausible deniability that Palmer set up in Too Like The Lightning on the way to this end doesn’t come together cleanly, or with a minimum of confusion in Seven Surrenders. However realistic and true-to-life this confusing trail of conflicting agendas might be, the difference between real life and fiction is that fiction, ultimately, needs to make sense. And in a novel where the world’s biggest movers and shakers are all part of the same faintly sordid sex club, I feel that the gap between the global and the personal needs to collapse a little more smoothly and with fewer hastily-wrapped dangling strands.

The political manoeuvrings, grand and personal, sit awkwardly alongside the peculiar immanent theology of Palmer’s novels. In Too Like The Lightning, the truth of Mycroft’s theological claims—the divinity of J.E.D.D. Mason, the miraculous powers of the child Bridger—rested in a state much like Schrödinger’s Cat, thanks to Mycroft’s unreliable nature as a narrator. But Seven Surrenders removes this fertile uncertainty, and give us narrative confirmation of the presence of divinity alongside the mundane.

This doesn’t make Seven Surrenders a bad book, mind you: taken together, Too Like The Lightning and Seven Surrenders make one extremely promising debut novel, but one where the promise of the first half is let down by the execution of the second. Seven Surrenders remains playfully baroque, vividly characterised, and possessed of a lively sense of humour, as well as a lively and argumentative interest in future societies and the problems of utopia. It’s just not the tour-de-force second book I was hoping for.

Seven Surrenders is available now from Tor Books.
Read an excerpt from the novel here on Tor.com.

Liz Bourke is a cranky queer person who reads books. She holds a Ph.D in Classics from Trinity College, Dublin. Find her at her blog. Or her Twitter. She supports the work of the Irish Refugee Council and the Abortion Rights Campaign.

About the Author

Liz Bourke

Author

Liz Bourke is a cranky queer person who reads books. She holds a Ph.D in Classics from Trinity College, Dublin. Her first book, Sleeping With Monsters, a collection of reviews and criticism, was published in 2017 by Aqueduct Press. It was a finalist for the 2018 Locus Awards and was nominated for a 2018 Hugo Award in Best Related Work. She was a finalist for the inaugural 2020 Ignyte Critic Award, and has also been a finalist for the BSFA nonfiction award. She lives in Ireland with an insomniac toddler, her wife, and their two very put-upon cats.
Learn More About Liz
Subscribe
Notify of
Avatar


13 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Avatar
Raskos
8 years ago

Just finished Too Like the Lightning, and while I found it very diverting in how it dealt with its future world, I was left wondering how that world developed from this one. Does Seven Surrenders fill in any of the history?

Avatar
8 years ago

Raskos: short answer, yes.

A linkier answer might include: Ada Palmer’s post on What the Future Will Call This Era; my TLtL timeline. The former shows that the author is well aware of your question. The latter includes some of the steps from now to 2454, gathered from various points in TLtL.

Avatar
Raskos
8 years ago

@2:

       Thanks, Andwat, greatly appreciated, especially the link. I found the book interesting enough that I was exercising my brain quite a bit, trying to get from here to there, and it will be interesting to see how far from the mark (or close) I was.

Avatar
8 years ago

@3: you’re most welcome.

@OP: I see what you mean. 7S seemed to have a lot of denouement. I tend to find setup more interesting.

But 7S also sets up the next two novels, and I’m looking forward to them very much.

Avatar
8 years ago

I got a lot less happy about the book when the nonbinary character’s pronouns turned out to be “it.” That might be OK in 2454, but it’s definitely not OK right now. I really wish Palme had paid attention to the reactions that Bujold has been getting for her hermaphrodites. 

Jono
Jono
8 years ago

I missed the original post about Too Like the Lightning and was fascinated so I went looking for it. Discovered it’s not available on Kindle, available on Kobo but not in Australia. It’s almost like, as someone who far prefers eBooks, they just don’t want my money.

Avatar
Crane
8 years ago

@5, What would you have had her use, though?

Singular them is the “default” pronoun of the setting, and given Mycroft’s intentional archaism in avoiding that, it wouldn’t make sense for them to call Sniper “them”. Similarly, an invented non-binary pronoun would be out of place because a world which commonly uses gender-neutral “them” wouldn’t have a need for one, nor would it fit with Mycroft’s deliberately retrogressive use of gendered pronouns.

Unless perhaps there was some historical early attempt at a neutral pronoun in the Enlightenment era? That would fit very well, but I’m not aware of any such…

Avatar
8 years ago

@5 I actually understood the “it” used for Sniper as a reflection of his being a “living doll” rather than as something to do with his actual gender.

Avatar
7 years ago

I enjoyed the first volume (Too Like the Lightning) which focused on the structure of this future society, although I was really annoyed by the total lack of an ending. But here in volume 2, she gets into her story at last. And, her story is just plain silly. All of the ideas which looked clever enough as social experiment degenerate into sheer nonsense when she tries to apply them to character action and motivation. She elevates the ‘idiot plot’ to a supernatural level. All the characters display an astonishing lack of coherent thought pattern, which is particularly bewildering since they are all so literate that they’ve read Voltaire and Aristotle, and speak four or five languages. This goes way beyond ‘debut novel mistakes’. It’s a disaster

Avatar
7 years ago

I agree with Crane that, having gone to such lengths to establish the general use of ‘they’ as a gender-neutral pronoun, Ms. Palmer should have used it on the one character who was genuinely neither he nor she.  I can’t say I agree with Cander that the pronoun ‘it’ was employed to denote Sniper’s status as a passive object because it didn’t appear until after Sniper was revealed to be a hermaphrodite–by which time Sniper was ceasing to serve as a passive object, and was becoming an active character.

Also, since Ms. Palmer puts a lot of emphasis on French social and sexual norms, she could have dredged up the French pronoun, ‘on’, an undifferentiated person, as in someone (which is still in common use in France today).

Avatar
Colin R
7 years ago

A little late to the party, but having just finished I wasn’t at all disappointed by the novel.  I feared that this series might splinter off into dissolution like A Song of Ice and Fire–so I am relieved that between the two books we have a complete story (even though there is promise of more to come.)  But it turned out better than I believed possible, given that two deities are walking the stage.

 

Regarding the pronouns, it seems worth pointing out again that Canner’s choice of pronouns is intentionally jarring and transgressive–and doesn’t have anything to do with self-identification.  When he identifies Dominic as ‘he’ or Carlyle Foster as ‘she’ it has nothing to do with their own gender identification or self-image.  Canner uses gender and pronouns as a way of expressing his own (or rather Madame d’Arouet’s) ideas: that gender is about performing roles, and concepts that are deeply rooted in our language and culture.  Further: that while I think d’Arouet and Canner have some points here, they are also both monsters, and they are wrong about important things.

 

Also worth considering is when this pronoun shift takes place: after Sniper has had a chance to speak for themselves, and explicitly deny Canner’s pronoun games.  Also after Sniper admits some uncomfortable details about themselves that indicate Sniper themselves might view themselves as an object, with ambivalence.  Certainly, Sniper’s identification as a living doll seems to be related to their identification as an assassin–ultimately, a tool and weapon to be used by others.  At the end of course, Canner’s pronoun choices are intended to rub you the wrong way, I think–and whatever he thinks about gender, many people in his world clearly don’t agree.

Avatar
Greg Locock
7 years ago

Perhaps those grizzling might like to check  whether “it” was used to describe the reanimated Sniper doll, not Sniper themself. That being said, what pronoun is used for the toy soldiers?

Avatar
teofilio tenedor del diablo
6 years ago

I just posted my so-called ‘review’ in/@@@@@ goodreads — yeah, you’d call it a re-gurgitation — but basically i’m still m-o-l overwhelmed by the scope and background and history of the two books I’ve read so far.  so… I have to read #3, don’t I?  and I just a few minutes ago found out there’s #4.  THAT slows me down a bit … call me simplistic but there was just a bit “too much talking” in “7” as compared to “lightning”.  I hope book #3 will be a bit more balanced.

that said, hopefully I’ve successfully implied/lauded the author’s scope of history (Mycroft and most other narrators familiar with many, many historical figures I wish I had more than a scant and passing familiarity with) —